Blog

Home > Microsoft Security > Microsoft Security Bulletin Ms02-045

Microsoft Security Bulletin Ms02-045

In no event shall Microsoft Corporation or its suppliers be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if Microsoft Corporation Is this patch cumulative? This patch does supersede all previously released security patches involving the SQL Server 7.0 and SQL Server 2000 database engines. The fix is included in MDAC 2.8. Details are discussed above in the FAQ. his comment is here

Instead, see the following procedure, "To Determine If CiscoUnity Version 3.1(2b) Is in Use." To Determine If CiscoUnity Version 3.1(2b) Is in Use Step1 Browse to the directory CommServer\ConfigurationSetup. The new VM build we released in the original version of this bulletin (build 3805) eliminates all known vulnerabilities. On March 14, 2002, Microsoft discovered that the English and German patches for Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition contained incorrect files. Verifying patch installation: To verify that the patch has been installed on the machine, confirm that the following registry key has been created on the machine: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\...\Q326830.

What new vulnerabilities are eliminated by this patch? There are two vulnerabilities addressed by this patch: A vulnerability related to HTTP Proxy Redirection. The shell can be used to locate files and folders through the Windows Explorer, to provide a consistent way to start applications through shortcuts on the "Start" menu, and to provide Am I still at risk from the Slammer Worm Virus? No. Do the procedures in either the first or the second section--depending on your upgrade plans--and the third section: •Downloading Full-Disc Files of CiscoUnity 3.1(6) CDs •Downloading Patch Files and Patching CiscoUnity

Step3 In the Language Settings for the System box, click Japanese. If the Install Voice Card Software check box is checked during Setup, the quiet parameter will be lost and must be reset after the upgrade. V6.0 (April 26, 2002): Bulletin updated to include patch availability for Windows 98 and Windows 98SE. The fix for this issue will be included in Windows XP Service Pack 1.

Since the Windows Shell runs in the context of the user, the attacker's code would also run as the user. The vulnerability results because several of the extended stored procedures provided by SQL Server handle user input incorrectly, and don't check the length of the input before using it. This vulnerability could only be exploited if Internet Explorer was configured to access Internet resources via a proxy server. https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms02-053.aspx Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Online Support web site.

This vulnerability allows an attacker to send a specially crafted packet request that causes denial of service on the target server and compromises the system. However, this patch has been superseded by the patch released with MS02-061 which contains fixes for additional security vulnerabilities in these products. How might an attacker exploit this vulnerability? Anything the user could do, the program also could do.

Patches for consumer platforms are available from the WindowsUpdate web site Other information: Acknowledgments Microsoft thanks the following individuals: Issue regarding ad hoc queries against non-SQL OLEDB data sources:[email protected] and [email protected] https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/ms02-061.aspx Disclaimer: The information provided in the Microsoft Knowledge Base is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. I thought that the SQL Server 2000 patch in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-039 corrected the vulnerability being exploited by the "slammer" virus. What causes the vulnerability? The vulnerability results because the component of the SNMP agent service that parses incoming commands contains an unchecked buffer.

You may download the latest and most comprehensive update here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/bb331729.aspx What do I need to do to make sure that my MSDE installation is updated? That depends on what product you http://getbetabox.com/microsoft-security/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms06-070.html Mitigating factors: Users who read e-mail messages as plain text would have to take an action before an attacker could exploit the vulnerability to be exploited. If you are using Exchange 2000 for the message store, either alone or with Exchange5.5, you must now create two accounts for CiscoUnity services--one for directory services and the other for Built at 2014-04-18T13:49:36Z-07:00 Show: Inherited Protected Print Export (0) Print Export (0) Share IN THIS ARTICLE Is this page helpful?

Stop the AvCsGateway service from the Services Control Panel, then restart the service. 3. Is this a problem with Microsoft Proxy Server or Internet Security and Acceleration Server 2000? Gigabit Ethernet Use of gigabit Ethernet is recommended on the CiscoUnity server for general connectivity, and in particular for the heartbeat link between CiscoUnity failover nodes, but it is not required. http://getbetabox.com/microsoft-security/microsoft-security-bulletin-ms02-018.html The Dialogic quiet parameter is preserved in an upgrade only if the voice card software is not reinstalled during the CiscoUnity Setup program.

However, SQL Server 7.0 administrators should still install the patch, as other vulnerabilities discussed in this bulletin do affect SQL Server 7.0. The content you requested has been removed. CiscoUnity3.1.6PatchFrom3.1.5-CD1-only.exe Will update only CiscoUnity 3.1(5) CD1 (CiscoUnity application files and ENU language files).

How does the Windows Shell get invoked to read these attributes? The specific function that contains the unchecked buffer is invoked only when the Windows Shell attempts to parse these custom attributes.

Failover and the CiscoUnity Bridge When the CiscoUnity server is configured for failover, the CiscoUnity subscriber directory is not synchronized with the Bridge directory while the secondary server is active. It is a privilege elevation vulnerability. The patch may take several minutes. If you have applied this security patch to a SQL Server 2000 or MSDE 2000 installation prior to applying the hotfix from Knowledge Patch article 317748, you must answer "no" if

The registry change is applied systemwide to all subscribers associated with the CiscoUnity server. Restart the Cisco Unity server for the changes to take effect. How might an attacker exploit the vulnerability? http://getbetabox.com/microsoft-security/microsoft-security-bulletin-03-026.html You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second.

Vulnerability identifier: CAN-2002-0053 Tested Versions: Microsoft tested Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 98SE, Windows ME, Windows NT 4.0, Windows 2000, and Windows XP to assess whether they are affected by this vulnerability. It's important to note that this capability could allow a malicious party to record a user's session information and possibly search for usernames, passwords, or credit card numbers sent in clear How likely is it that a web server or other Internet-exposed system would be vulnerable? If best practices have been followed, SNMP wouldn't be used on an Internet-exposed machine. The patch also locks down permissions on the table that stores information about web tasks.

The user's full session after visiting the attacker's site could potentially be "sniffed" by the attacker. Service Pack3a is currently being qualified for use with CiscoUnity. A new variant of a vulnerability originally discussed in Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-038, through which an already authenticated user could gain additional privileges on a SQL Server. In addition, it is possible that they could change the operation of the SNMP service.

Security Resources: The Microsoft TechNet Security Web Site provides additional information about security in Microsoft products. However, in a file and print networking environment this may not be a viable solution because it would block legitimate users from using file and print services on a particular server By calling this function with specially chosen parameters, an attacker could cause a buffer overrun condition to occur. However, when a job step requests that an output file be created, the SQL Server Agent does so using its own privileges rather than the job owners privileges.

Or delete or update the web tasks or insert new ones in order to potentially escalate privileges. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability against a server configured in this manner would gain control over the database, but little else. Why? A vulnerability results because it is possible for an attacker to exploit this flaw and use it to execute code outside of the sandbox.

How difficult would it be for the attacker to deliver SNMP Management requests to an affected system? It's likely that an attacker located within a network could deliver SNMP management requests to By design, the SQL Server Agent should only perform job steps that are appropriate for the requesting user's privileges.