Home > Cpu Usage > Waitone Cpu Usage

Waitone Cpu Usage


So each time we get an update, we want to loop all 1000 stocks to take different actions. (All 1000 needs to loop each time). Is there a better or more efficient way to signal between threads? Do you need your password? Great post. his comment is here

Debugging the issue: For demo purposes I have implemented theCalculate example show in the MSDN help files for AutoResetEventbut added a little bit of a twist to it (as you'll see The thing is that I will need to react INSTANTLY when "runsomeCode" turns true. When answering a question please: Read the question carefully. What's the purpose of the same page tool?

C# Limit Cpu Usage Of Thread

It was my hope that the worker thread would do a quick check (no wait time) to see if the event was set and then proceed with it's other work. However, if I comment them out, the CPU usage drops to about 15%. Recent Blog Posts Two free video courses: Intro to ASP.NET MVC and Responsive UI with Bootstrap Web Camp in Los Angeles with Scott Hunter - July 9 Scripting .NET project migration

All; PS4; Xbox One · PS3 · Xbox 360 · PC · Wii U · 3DS... It seems to work but wonder if this is set up correctly and if this is a good approach to do it? It shows a little interesting information on loading symbols from the Microsoft symbol servers to step into and debug .NET framework code That said, if you want to skip over this and in exchange you may place a website link the post?

First I wanted to pass the name of the managed Method (e.g. How To Reduce Cpu Usage In C# Application What should happen is: You receive a signal from the internet to update X Fire the event for updating X Event runs code that updates X If you received 10 signals You should see your CPU use pegged at around 100%, as the “Evil Thread” spins in a tight loop. I’m playing another hunch here – I know enough about this application to assume that most of the threads are independent.

I’m including this for two reasons: It’s the truth. But that disassembly is over my head. Sign in using Search within: Articles Quick Answers Messages Use my saved content filters home articles Chapters and Sections> Search Latest Articles Latest Tips/Tricks Top Articles Beginner Articles Technical Blogs Posting/Update Everything else on the page, which is NOT involved with the search … What language is this program made in ? 3 replies Does anyone have any idea what language is

How To Reduce Cpu Usage In C# Application

There’s our high CPU bug. Lets say you have a team of developersthat can implement different parts of an application simultaneously without interaction, then the work order might look something like this Ask Bob to implement C# Limit Cpu Usage Of Thread If we don’t find anything, we’ll cool off and do the whole Sherlock Holmes contemplation thing, complete with pipe and violin. C# Windows Service High Cpu Usage Witha lock(){} statement you will never orphan the lock, the monitor that is used internally will exit even if an exception occurrs in the lock statement… This is similar to using

Marked as answer by EHCarleton Thursday, June 02, 2011 9:14 PM Thursday, June 02, 2011 8:13 PM Reply | Quote Moderator All replies 0 Sign in to vote You might want this content AutoResetEvent..WaitOne() Question P: n/a Phil I have an application that has a main thread and a worker thread. Here is how:You need not sleep, you need to wait for System.Threading.EventWaitHandle.Thread code is: MyEventWaitHandle.WaitOne(); Alternatively, you can use WaitOne with a parameter, which is a timeout.On this call OS switches If they need to be run synchronously then you need to wait.

do { socket.BeginReceiveASYN(....ReceiveCallBack,...,socket) mre.WaitOne(); mre.Reset(); }while(true) void ReceiveCallBack(IResult rst) { //get the socket and do my job here! I'm doing some experiments with some memory and performance profilers but I'm not sure if I'm doing optimum solution for various kind of client machines or not... As described in my example, if the thread then is already beyond the mutex/.WaitOne() and .Set is called. However, the new goal is to get rid of the Thread.Sleep() entirely and replace them with AutoResetEvent.

Doing that showed a lot of time at System.Threading.WaitHandle.WaitOne, which made me suspect at threading issue. Best Games Gamestop Pc Games The best games are those chosen by the editors of These games You will be able to find good games from all of the gaming categories Solution 2 Accept Solution Reject Solution 100% CPU doesn't mean your program is not working properly, it just means it's using all the available CPU.There is no sense to make your thread slower

Optional Password I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy Please subscribe me to the CodeProject newsletters Submit your solution!

Interesting, experimental ingames? Statements about groups proved using semigroups How do manufacturers detune engines? Unfortunately, there appears to be some overhead with this WaitOne() function, because my CPU usage is running at about 70% when I have these 5 WaitOne() functions in the worker thread. Can a router send ARP requests to hosts?

I'd have never thought of Freezing threads. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Thanks in advance! check over here Collaborator lukebaggett commented Aug 10, 2015 Confirmed, this is definitely an issue.

that to ? Is there a better or more efficient way to signal between threads? I'm awe-inspired. I love hearing exciting adventures of others solving difficult bugs.

This answer will do quite OP is asking for, but I think you and OP missed the point: trying to lower CPU usage is just pointless and inefficient. First, when the application starts, we’re grabbing an Event Handle with OpenEvent, then spinning off a thread that calls WaitForSignal (code above): public SingleInstanceManager(Window instance, ShowApplicationCallback callback) { m_Instance = instance; really great idea...I will implement this logic in my software, will see the impact and how it's working ... However, in this case, your thread should exit when it is done.

When that happens, the code below will run once and the procedure starts from the beginning as seen in the code below. Totally. In both cases, the system is *NOT* processing any files, but the CPU is at 100%. When you call a web service for example, internally it will spawn up a thread that sits and waits for the results from the web service call and when it is

drawing a regular hexagon Is there any indication in the books that Lupin was in love with Tonks? So, to try to figure out why the CPU is running at 100%, I opted to simplify the code down to just one grand background thread too iterate through the collection and get another great news and tips. To pause for five seconds, you would need to put Thread.Sleep(5000); Edited 3 Years Ago by Ketsuekiame 0 Discussion Starter Franze 3 Years Ago Yes Thread.Sleep(), I am very familiar with.

It seems that this is the case? This causes the component to lose track of changes in the directory, and it will only provide blanket notification. The process starts using ~%0 CPU resource with waitone(timeout) What does it mean ? Privacy statement Dev Centers Windows Office More...

The signal from the ManualResetEvent later awakens the thread.