Blog

Home > Access Violation > Access Violation Exception C#

Access Violation Exception C#

Contents

It only occurs in VS2013. share|improve this answer edited Sep 28 at 8:10 answered Jul 22 '10 at 18:35 Dirk Vollmar 111k36187261 4 To clarify: the reason you want to exit ASAP is that you See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dd419661.aspx#id0070035 for details. I've tried rebooting, disabling virus checker, firewall, etc. weblink

Why does rotation occur? see more linked questions… Related 1385How do I calculate someone's age in C#?2427How do I enumerate an enum?1841How to check if a directory exists and create it if necessary?1604How to get It is possible to work around the issue by disabling Managed return values. Any ideas? https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.accessviolationexception(v=vs.110).aspx

System.accessviolationexception Was Unhandled

The error is being thrown by the IBM iDbAccess library, and happens consistently when debugging. How to politely decline a postdoc job offer after signing the offer letter? in unmanaged code, the CLR will deliver it to managed code where you are also able to catch it1. Read this article about CSE's in the .NET 4.0 Framework: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dd419661.aspx#id0070035 But there is hope.

Down here i put a code snippet of the adding of some items to the OPC-connection, the function in which the exception occures.public bool StartOPCConnection() { bool retval = false; // This is a different kind of exception than the managed CLR exceptions from System.Exception. Installing .NET 4.5.2 didn't solve it for me, but changing the "Platform target" from "Any CPU" to "x86" did (on the "Build" property page). System.accessviolationexception Citrix As John already clarified, the unmanaged DLL might already have corrupted the process memory before the access violation has been raised.

For more information about data breakpoints, see the data breakpoint section in Using Breakpoints.See AlsoDebugging Native Code FAQs Show: Inherited Protected Print Export (0) Print Export (0) Share IN THIS ARTICLE This bug will not be fixed in version 5.0 of the common controls, because that version was for applications existing prior to Windows XP. Sign in using Search within: Articles Quick Answers Messages Use my saved content filters home articles Chapters and Sections> Search Latest Articles Latest Tips/Tricks Top Articles Beginner Articles Technical Blogs Posting/Update news Linux questions C# questions ASP.NET questions fabric questions C++ questions discussionsforums All Message Boards...

It may have been writing garbage in enough places that your program cannot safely continue. –John Saunders Jul 22 '10 at 18:38 @John Saunders: Thanks for the clarification. System.accessviolationexception C++ Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 30-Apr-13 11:43am Could you explain how PROVEN? You should talk not about "bitness", but about instruction-set architecture. I cannot agree, because before XP it was 2K, which I think is good.

System.accessviolationexception Attempted To Read Or Write Protected Memory

An AccessViolationException doesn't necesarrilly mean a 'write'. Exception: System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. System.accessviolationexception Was Unhandled Collatz Conjecture (3n+1) variant more hot questions question feed lang-cs about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Handleprocesscorruptedstateexceptions C# Its NOT my code.

How can I handle this exception that is thrown within the COM object? have a peek at these guys You can also do it on a case-by-case basis by marking methods where you want to catch these exceptions with the HandleProcessCorruptedStateExceptions attribute. If the native code is your own project, then the easiest way to set this up is to put both the .NET project and the C++ project in the same solution, Arguments of \newcommand as variable names? Access Violation Exception C++

Its not my code's fault either. It's very uncommon and we've never seen it in house, so we've never been able to debug it. Now it will. –Andiih Nov 27 '13 at 15:55 @Andiih unless the corrupted bits are the code that would restart it. http://getbetabox.com/access-violation/access-violation-exception-msdn.html I would use external watchdogs for this purpose. –R.

Any link? Access Violation Exception Was Unhandled Visual Studio Go to the System properties (Win8: WinKey+X, select ‘System’, Win7: Open ‘Properties’ from my computer) Advanced System Settings Environment Variables… Click ‘New’ and add Name: VSDebug_DisableManagedReturnValue Value: 1 source: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/819552/visual-studio-debugger-throws-accessviolationexception share|improve So there must be something different in your configuration. –Jim Mischel Jun 18 '14 at 21:31 | show 9 more comments 6 Answers 6 active oldest votes up vote 5 down

Makes no difference which version of .NET my app targets either (2.0, 3.5, 4.0, whatever).

Most programs cannot safely continue execution after an access violation. When Calling a Function Hundreds of Times, How Do I know Which Call Failed? Both are up to date. How To Handle Accessviolationexception C# How Can I Debug Windows API Functions?

Terms of Service Layout: fixed | fluid CodeProject, 503-250 Ferrand Drive Toronto Ontario, M3C 3G8 Canada +1 416-849-8900 x 100 This change does not affect AccessViolationException exceptions thrown by user code, which can continue to be caught by a catch statement. However, catching SEH exceptions is mostly not a good idea. http://getbetabox.com/access-violation/access-violation-exception-handling.html We get reports of this very occasionally on users' machines in .NET Reflector: Application.Run() throws an AccessViolationException, but we have no idea why.

Thus, access violations almost always indicate serious programming errors. A NullReferenceException is also thrown when a null reference is dereferenced in verifiable managed code, an occurrence that does not involve data corruption, and there is no way to distinguish between If it is passed as a parameter, make sure that it is passed correctly, and you aren’t accidentally creating a shallow copy. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed

Is there any way to determine the illegal address or pointer value that caused the crash? You’ll be auto redirected in 1 second. asked 6 years ago viewed 12833 times active 3 months ago Linked 1 How to trap exceptions from .NET WebBrowser plugins/add-ons? This isn't a problem as long as code doesn't attempt to handle exceptional conditions that it cannot reasonably handle.

I won't get into the why's or how's here. it took my right to the xaml error i got, it was all a missed "

But working further than that is not a good idea... –rioki Jul 22 '10 at 18:48 Probably not, at least not if you're not absolutely positive that nothing bad Here is what I observe: all those manufacturers of "industrial" grade products are usually adapt computer technologies too slowly (most of them are quite illiterate, unfortunately, sucked a lot of blood To handle such an AccessViolationException exception, you should apply the HandleProcessCorruptedStateExceptionsAttribute attribute to the method in which the exception is thrown. Browse other questions tagged c# .net exception access-violation or ask your own question.

Browse other questions tagged c# access-violation or ask your own question. Access violations in unmanaged code that bubble up to managed code are always wrapped in an AccessViolationException.See AlsoHow to: Use the Exception AssistantMemory Management: ExamplesAutomatic Memory Management Show: Inherited Protected Print